BibSLEIGH — Andrew

Travelled to:

1 × Austria
1 × Canada
1 × Chile
1 × Finland
1 × France
1 × Greece
1 × Portugal
1 × Singapore
1 × The Netherlands
1 × United Kingdom
2 × China
4 × USA

Collaborated with:

F.Scholer W.R.Hersh M.Wu M.Sanderson J.Zobel S.Mizzaro Y.Tsegay M.Shokouhi E.Maddalena S.J.Puglisi T.Jones Y.Zhang B.Billerbeck R.Sinha A.Moffat D.Hawking H.E.Williams J.A.Thom R.Wilkinson K.Järvelin J.S.Culpepper S.Price B.Chan D.Kraemer L.Sacherek D.Olson

Talks about:

user (7) evalu (6) effect (4) relev (4) collect (3) versus (3) search (3) result (3) differ (3) batch (3)

Person: Andrew Turpin

DBLP: Turpin:Andrew

Contributed to:

2015

2014

2012

2011

2009

2008

2007

2006

2002

2001

2000

2009

Wrote 22 papers:

ECIR-2015-JonesSTMS: Different Rankers on Different Subcollections (TJ, FS, AT, SM, MS), pp. 203–208.
ECIR-2015-MaddalenaMST #estimation #using: Judging Relevance Using Magnitude Estimation (EM, SM, FS, AT), pp. 215–220.
SIGIR-2015-TurpinSMM #estimation #evaluation #information retrieval: The Benefits of Magnitude Estimation Relevance Assessments for Information Retrieval Evaluation (AT, FS, SM, EM), pp. 565–574.
CIKM-2014-JonesTMSS #comprehension #consistency #evaluation #matter #nondeterminism: Size and Source Matter: Understanding Inconsistencies in Test Collection-Based Evaluation (TJ, AT, SM, FS, MS), pp. 1843–1846.
CIKM-2012-SandersonTZS #difference #effectiveness: Differences in effectiveness across sub-collections (MS, AT, YZ, FS), pp. 1965–1969.
SIGIR-2011-ScholerTS #consistency #quality: Quantifying test collection quality based on the consistency of relevance judgements (FS, AT, MS), pp. 1063–1072.
ECIR-2009-TsegayPTZ #documentation #generative #performance #query: Document Compaction for Efficient Query Biased Snippet Generation (YT, SJP, AT, JZ), pp. 509–520.
SIGIR-2009-TurpinSJWC #evaluation #summary: Including summaries in system evaluation (AT, FS, KJ, MW, JSC), pp. 508–515.
ECIR-2008-ScholerSBT #using: Using Clicks as Implicit Judgments: Expectations Versus Observations (FS, MS, BB, AT), pp. 28–39.
ECIR-2008-ShokouhiST #documentation #effectiveness #order: Investigating the Effectiveness of Clickthrough Data for Document Reordering (MS, FS, AT), pp. 591–595.
SIGIR-2008-ScholerT: Relevance thresholds in system evaluations (FS, AT), pp. 693–694.
SIGIR-2008-WuST: User preference choices for complex question answering (MW, FS, AT), pp. 717–718.
SIGIR-2008-WuTZ #community: Aggregated click-through data in a homogeneous user community (MW, AT, JZ), pp. 731–732.
SIGMOD-2008-SinhaPMT #array #locality #pattern matching #performance: Improving suffix array locality for fast pattern matching on disk (RS, SJP, AM, AT), pp. 661–672.
CIKM-2007-TsegayTZ #effectiveness: Dynamic index pruning for effective caching (YT, AT, JZ), pp. 987–990.
SIGIR-2007-TurpinTHW #generative #performance #web: Fast generation of result snippets in web search (AT, YT, DH, HEW), pp. 127–134.
SIGIR-2006-TurpinS #metric #performance #precise: User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks (AT, FS), pp. 11–18.
SIGIR-2002-TurpinH #user interface: User interface effects in past batch versus user experiments (AT, WRH), pp. 431–432.
SIGIR-2001-TurpinH #why: Why Batch and User Evaluations Do Not Give the Same Results (AT, WRH), pp. 225–231.
SIGIR-2000-HershTPCKSO #evaluation #question: Do batch and user evaluation give the same results? (WRH, AT, SP, BC, DK, LS, DO), pp. 17–24.
JCDL-2009-WuTTW #analysis #enterprise: Cost and benefit analysis of mediated enterprise search (MW, JAT, AT, RW), pp. 267–276.