Travelled to:
1 × Austria
1 × Denmark
1 × India
1 × South Africa
1 × Spain
1 × Switzerland
12 × USA
2 × France
2 × Italy
Collaborated with:
R.Joshi M.A.Alipour R.Gopinath C.Zhang ∅ C.Jensen G.J.Holzmann D.Kröning D.Peled M.Yannakakis Y.Chen J.Regehr S.Chaki W.Visser D.Marinov E.Eide K.Havelund M.H.Smith N.Blanc F.Lerda O.Strichman G.Bhat R.Cleaveland D.Le J.H.Andrews M.Weston R.Xu I.Ahmed P.E.McKenney E.M.Clarke S.Jha H.Veith A.Shi I.A.0001 C.Brindescu M.Gligoric R.Sharma W.Wong X.Fern M.Mossberg F.Manzano E.Hennenfent G.Grieco J.Feist T.Brunson A.Dinaburg
Talks about:
test (10) model (5) check (5) program (4) coverag (4) verif (4) reduct (3) adapt (3) use (3) counterexampl (2)
Person: Alex Groce
DBLP: Groce:Alex
Facilitated 1 volumes:
Contributed to:
Wrote 28 papers:
- ICSE-2014-GopinathJG #developer #evaluation #test coverage
- Code coverage for suite evaluation by developers (RG, CJ, AG), pp. 72–82.
- ICST-2014-GroceAZCR #reduction #testing
- Cause Reduction for Quick Testing (AG, MAA, CZ, YC, JR), pp. 243–252.
- ISSTA-2014-LeAGG #haskell #mutation testing #named #source code #testing
- MuCheck: an extensible tool for mutation testing of haskell programs (DL, MAA, RG, AG), pp. 429–432.
- ISSTA-2014-ZhangGA #execution #reduction #symbolic computation #testing #using
- Using test case reduction and prioritization to improve symbolic execution (CZ, AG, MAA), pp. 160–170.
- Onward-2014-GroceAG
- Coverage and Its Discontents (AG, MAA, RG), pp. 255–268.
- ISSTA-2013-GligoricGZSAM #test coverage #testing #using
- Comparing non-adequate test suites using coverage criteria (MG, AG, CZ, RS, MAA, DM), pp. 302–313.
- PLDI-2013-ChenGZWFER #compilation #fuzzing
- Taming compiler fuzzers (YC, AG, CZ, WKW, XF, EE, JR), pp. 197–208.
- ISSTA-2012-GroceZECR #testing
- Swarm testing (AG, CZ, EE, YC, JR), pp. 78–88.
- ASE-2011-Groce #adaptation #generative #programming
- Coverage rewarded: Test input generation via adaptation-based programming (AG), pp. 380–383.
- ICSE-2010-GroceHS #evolution #specification #testing
- From scripts to specifications: the evolution of a flight software testing effort (AG, KH, MHS), pp. 129–138.
- ASE-2008-AndrewsGWX #effectiveness #random testing
- Random Test Run Length and Effectiveness (JHA, AG, MW, RGX), pp. 19–28.
- ASE-2008-HolzmannJG #verification
- Swarm Verification (GJH, RJ, AG), pp. 1–6.
- VMCAI-2008-GroceJ #dynamic analysis #model checking
- Extending Model Checking with Dynamic Analysis (AG, RJ), pp. 142–156.
- ASE-2007-BlancGK #abstraction #c++ #verification
- Verifying C++ with STL containers via predicate abstraction (NB, AG, DK), pp. 521–524.
- ICSE-2007-GroceHJ #difference #random #testing #verification
- Randomized Differential Testing as a Prelude to Formal Verification (AG, GJH, RJ), pp. 621–631.
- TACAS-2006-GroceJ #program analysis
- Exploiting Traces in Program Analysis (AG, RJ), pp. 379–393.
- CAV-2004-GroceKL #comprehension
- Understanding Counterexamples with explain (AG, DK, FL), pp. 453–456.
- FSE-2004-ChakiGS
- Explaining abstract counterexamples (SC, AG, OS), pp. 73–82.
- TACAS-2004-Groce #distance #fault #metric
- Error Explanation with Distance Metrics (AG), pp. 108–122.
- ICSE-2003-ChakiCGJV #c #component #composition #verification
- Modular Verification of Software Components in C (SC, EMC, AG, SJ, HV), pp. 385–395.
- CAV-2002-GrocePY #adaptation #model checking #named
- AMC: An Adaptive Model Checker (AG, DP, MY), pp. 521–525.
- ISSTA-2002-GroceV #heuristic #java #model checking #source code #using
- Model checking Java programs using structural heuristics (AG, WV), pp. 12–21.
- TACAS-2002-GrocePY #adaptation #model checking
- Adaptive Model Checking (AG, DP, MY), pp. 357–370.
- CAV-2001-BhatCG #automaton #model checking #performance
- Efficient Model Checking Via Büchi Tableau Automata (GB, RC, AG), pp. 38–52.
- ASE-2015-GroceAJM #how #verification
- How Verified is My Code? Falsification-Driven Verification (T) (AG, IA, CJ, PEM), pp. 737–748.
- ASE-2016-AlipourSGMG #reduction #testing
- Evaluating non-adequate test-case reduction (MAA, AS, RG, DM, AG), pp. 16–26.
- FSE-2016-AhmedGBGJ #effectiveness #question
- Can testedness be effectively measured? (IA0, RG, CB, AG, CJ), pp. 547–558.
- ASE-2019-MossbergMHGGFBD #contract #execution #framework #named #symbolic computation
- Manticore: A User-Friendly Symbolic Execution Framework for Binaries and Smart Contracts (MM, FM, EH, AG, GG, JF, TB, AD), pp. 1186–1189.