Travelled to:1 × South Korea
4 × Canada
5 × USA
Collaborated with:S.E.Hudson ∅ J.Fogarty J.T.Biehl A.Dunnigan B.Y.Lim A.K.Dey S.R.Fussell F.Iannacci E.Turnquist S.N.Patel C.G.Atkeson J.Forlizzi S.B.Kiesler J.C.Lee J.Yang
Talks about:communic (4) respons (3) predict (3) instant (3) messag (3) effect (3) interrupt (2) intellig (2) perform (2) percept (2)
Person: Daniel Avrahami
DBLP: Avrahami:Daniel
Contributed to:
2015
201520112009200820072006200620042003Wrote 10 papers:
- CHI-2015-Avrahami #performance
- The Effect of Edge Targets on Touch Performance (DA), pp. 1837–1846.
- CSCW-2015-BiehlAD #communication #comprehension
- Not Really There: Understanding Embodied Communication Affordances in Team Perception and Participation (JTB, DA, AD), pp. 1567–1575.
- CHI-2011-IannacciTAP #feedback #interactive #multi #physics
- The haptic laser: multi-sensation tactile feedback for at-a-distance physical space perception and interaction (FI, ET, DA, SNP), pp. 2047–2050.
- CHI-2009-LimDA #why
- Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems (BYL, AKD, DA), pp. 2119–2128.
- CSCW-2008-AvrahamiFH #communication #latency
- IM waiting: timing and responsiveness in semi-synchronous communication (DA, SRF, SEH), pp. 285–294.
- CHI-2007-AvrahamiFH #bias #estimation
- Biases in human estimation of interruptibility: effects and implications for practice (DA, JF, SEH), pp. 50–60.
- CHI-2006-AvrahamiH #communication #latency #modelling #predict
- Responsiveness in instant messaging: predictive models supporting inter-personal communication (DA, SEH), pp. 731–740.
- CSCW-2006-AvrahamiH #communication #predict
- Communication characteristics of instant messaging: effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships (DA, SEH), pp. 505–514.
- CSCW-2004-AvrahamiH #latency #named #performance
- QnA: augmenting an instant messaging client to balance user responsiveness and performance (DA, SEH), pp. 515–518.
- CHI-2003-HudsonFAAFKLY #predict
- Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study (SEH, JF, CGA, DA, JF, SBK, JCL, JY), pp. 257–264.